<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for RandomlyEvil.org.uk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk</link>
	<description>I look the same, but I have changed</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 10:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on The view in Prague by Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/09/19/the-view-in-prague/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:01:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/09/19/the-view-in-prague/#comment-142</guid>
		<description>That's actually pretty creepy, especially seeing the van and the red car switch places. Your next task is to take a series of 10 on a motorway and stich them together!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually pretty creepy, especially seeing the van and the red car switch places. Your next task is to take a series of 10 on a motorway and stich them together!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista/PC Suite Bluetooth Oddities by Bryn_S</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/29/bluetooth-oddities/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryn_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=16#comment-130</guid>
		<description>IMHO, it should only list devices it has actually found in the scan. Otherwise it misleads the user to thinking that the device is actually there and visible.

If it needs to show ones it's contacted before, they should appear in a separate payne to give the user an indication that these devices have been communicated with, but aren't necessarily available.

B</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IMHO, it should only list devices it has actually found in the scan. Otherwise it misleads the user to thinking that the device is actually there and visible.</p>
<p>If it needs to show ones it&#8217;s contacted before, they should appear in a separate payne to give the user an indication that these devices have been communicated with, but aren&#8217;t necessarily available.</p>
<p>B</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Vista/PC Suite Bluetooth Oddities by Scatman Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/29/bluetooth-oddities/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Scatman Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=16#comment-127</guid>
		<description>IIRC, paired devices are always shown in that panel if and only if no devices are found by the scan. Quirky, sure.

Not sure why you'd get the balloon tip, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IIRC, paired devices are always shown in that panel if and only if no devices are found by the scan. Quirky, sure.</p>
<p>Not sure why you&#8217;d get the balloon tip, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Spooks] Code 9 &#8212; FAIL by Alan</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/11/spooks-spinoff/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Aug 2008 19:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=12#comment-125</guid>
		<description>I am SO delighted to be able to advise all you "Spooks" fans that the REAL "Spooks" will be back on our screens in September 2008.

You can safely dump this Spooks Code 9 right where it belongs!

YIPPEE :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am SO delighted to be able to advise all you &#8220;Spooks&#8221; fans that the REAL &#8220;Spooks&#8221; will be back on our screens in September 2008.</p>
<p>You can safely dump this Spooks Code 9 right where it belongs!</p>
<p>YIPPEE <img src='http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Spooks] Code 9 &#8212; FAIL by Bryn_S</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/11/spooks-spinoff/#comment-115</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryn_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 09:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=12#comment-115</guid>
		<description>Well, even with PAYG, if they're all homeless and desparate, how do they pay for the topups?

Also, what was with that godawful flag thing between scenes? Was it incase you forgot what country the show is set in? If they go abroad, does it change to a different flag? Like the old transformers cartoon used to change from Autobots to the Decepticons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, even with PAYG, if they&#8217;re all homeless and desparate, how do they pay for the topups?</p>
<p>Also, what was with that godawful flag thing between scenes? Was it incase you forgot what country the show is set in? If they go abroad, does it change to a different flag? Like the old transformers cartoon used to change from Autobots to the Decepticons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Spooks] Code 9 &#8212; FAIL by Matt In The Hat</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/11/spooks-spinoff/#comment-114</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt In The Hat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Aug 2008 02:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=12#comment-114</guid>
		<description>I particularly liked the division of the North into sectors with no explanation of what they mean. Also the way in which the scenes set in public looked perfectly normal, considering that the economic centre of the country had been destroyed; that there would no longer be a seat for international trading along with the loss of a great deal of farm land not to mention the huge upheaval in infrastructure which would necessitate a drastic increase in taxation upon an already desperate population.

My favourite was the way in which everyone had mobile 'phones and yet half the population seemed to be of no fixed abode. Where are the bills sent? I suppose that they can be on pay-as-you-go but still...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I particularly liked the division of the North into sectors with no explanation of what they mean. Also the way in which the scenes set in public looked perfectly normal, considering that the economic centre of the country had been destroyed; that there would no longer be a seat for international trading along with the loss of a great deal of farm land not to mention the huge upheaval in infrastructure which would necessitate a drastic increase in taxation upon an already desperate population.</p>
<p>My favourite was the way in which everyone had mobile &#8216;phones and yet half the population seemed to be of no fixed abode. Where are the bills sent? I suppose that they can be on pay-as-you-go but still&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Spooks] Code 9 &#8212; FAIL by Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/11/spooks-spinoff/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 11:01:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=12#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Has BBC3 produced anything good?

You've obviously never seen Scallywagga, or the truly amazing Trex And Flipside. Not to mention the unmissable Eastenders Revealed.

Seriously, though, Monkey Dust is pretty good, as was Man Stroke Women. The rest is fucking bilge, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has BBC3 produced anything good?</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve obviously never seen Scallywagga, or the truly amazing Trex And Flipside. Not to mention the unmissable Eastenders Revealed.</p>
<p>Seriously, though, Monkey Dust is pretty good, as was Man Stroke Women. The rest is fucking bilge, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Spooks] Code 9 &#8212; FAIL by Dx</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/11/spooks-spinoff/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Dx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2008 06:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=12#comment-109</guid>
		<description>http://newsbiscuit.com/article/spooks-code-9-likely-to-be-worse-than-actual-terror-attack-338

Enough said, really

-Dx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://newsbiscuit.com/article/spooks-code-9-likely-to-be-worse-than-actual-terror-attack-338" rel="nofollow">http://newsbiscuit.com/article/spooks-code-9-likely-to-be-worse-than-actual-terror-attack-338</a></p>
<p>Enough said, really</p>
<p>-Dx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Spooks] Code 9 &#8212; FAIL by Jimmy</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/11/spooks-spinoff/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jimmy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:39:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=12#comment-108</guid>
		<description>Lily Allen and Friends?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lily Allen and Friends?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on [Spooks] Code 9 &#8212; FAIL by Bryn_S</title>
		<link>http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/2008/08/11/spooks-spinoff/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryn_S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 09:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.randomlyevil.org.uk/?p=12#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Now you're just being desperate...

That said, this did actually make Torchwood look *really* good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now you&#8217;re just being desperate&#8230;</p>
<p>That said, this did actually make Torchwood look *really* good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
